Birmingham Legion vs Chattanooga Red Wolves
USA
USL Cup 2025 Protective Stadium 
Tendances de Buts
Birmingham Legion
VS
Chattanooga Red Wolves
1.38
Buts Marqués
0.88
1.88
Buts Encaissés
1.25
75%
Plus de 1.5
75%
50%
Plus de 2.5
50%
38%
Plus de 3.5
0%
Detailed Analysis
Explore Head-to-Head and Form below for more insights.
Analyse d'Expert par Omoye ThankGod
Chattanooga Red Wolves hold a slight statistical advantage, though this match remains competitive. Recent games suggest an open game with likely chances at both ends.
Their head-to-head record shows a history of competitive battles. Considering both teams' scoring consistency, goals on both ends seem highly likely. The numbers provide a solid foundation for this match outlook.
Probabilité de Résultat
Vainqueur du Match
Victoire Domicile34%
Match Nul20%
Victoire Extérieur46%
Buts & Score
Les Deux Équipes Marquent65%
Plus de 1.5 Buts72%
Plus de 2.5 Buts57%
Événements du Match
10'
10'
Trejo D.
32'
32'
Jerez R.
42'
42'
Damus R.
Previous Encounters
27 Apr 25 USL
Birmingham Legion
✓
3:1
Chattanooga Red Wolves
15 Feb 25 CLU
Birmingham Legion
1:2
✓
Chattanooga Red Wolves
18 Apr 24 OPE
Birmingham Legion
✓
4:2
Chattanooga Red Wolves
05 Apr 23 OPE
Chattanooga Red Wolves
1:4
✓
Birmingham Legion
17 Apr 21 CLU
Birmingham Legion
✓
4:1
Chattanooga Red Wolves
Recent Form (Last 5)
Birmingham Legion
Home Team 25 Oct
Charleston
2 : 1 Birmingham Legion
19 Oct
Birmingham Legion
2 : 3 Miami FC
04 Oct
Loudoun United
0 : 1 Birmingham Legion
02 Oct
Birmingham Legion
1 : 1 North Carolina FC
28 Sept
San Antonio FC
0 : 0 Birmingham Legion
Chattanooga Red Wolves
Away Team 01 Nov
Chattanooga Red Wolves
0 : 1 Portland Hearts of Pine
25 Oct
Chattanooga Red Wolves
2 : 1 Westchester SC
17 Oct
Charlotte Independence
1 : 2 Chattanooga Red Wolves
11 Oct
Forward Madison
2 : 1 Chattanooga Red Wolves
04 Oct
Chattanooga Red Wolves
0 : 0 Greenville Triumph
League Standings
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sacramento Republic | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 6:1 | 9 |
| 2 | Las Vegas Lights | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 7:6 | 9 |
| 3 | Monterey Bay | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6:6 | 6 |
| 4 | Orange County SC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5:6 | 6 |
| 5 | AV Alta FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6:6 | 5 |
| 6 | Oakland Roots | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5:7 | 4 |
| 7 | Spokane Velocity | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2:5 | 3 |
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | San Antonio FC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 6:3 | 10 |
| 2 | New Mexico | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 11:8 | 8 |
| 3 | Phoenix Rising | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 12:10 | 7 |
| 4 | Colorado Springs | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7:5 | 7 |
| 5 | El Paso Locomotive | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4:4 | 6 |
| 6 | Union Omaha | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3:5 | 3 |
| 7 | Texoma FC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5:13 | 1 |
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Indy Eleven | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 9:2 | 11 |
| 2 | Birmingham Legion | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 8:5 | 10 |
| 3 | Chattanooga Red Wolves | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5:8 | 5 |
| 4 | FC Tulsa | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 8:8 | 4 |
| 5 | Forward Madison | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3:8 | 4 |
| 6 | One Knoxville | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3:5 | 2 |
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rhode Island | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 11:5 | 10 |
| 2 | Hartford Athletic | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 10:7 | 9 |
| 3 | Detroit City | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9:6 | 8 |
| 4 | Portland Hearts of Pine | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8:10 | 5 |
| 5 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3:5 | 4 |
| 6 | Westchester SC | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3:11 | 0 |
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Charlotte Independence | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9:5 | 9 |
| 2 | Louisville City | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 8:4 | 9 |
| 3 | Loudoun United | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 6:4 | 9 |
| 4 | North Carolina FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4:4 | 5 |
| 5 | Lexington | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6:6 | 4 |
| 6 | Richmond Kickers | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1:11 | 0 |
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Greenville Triumph | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 6:3 | 9 |
| 2 | Tampa Bay | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8:7 | 7 |
| 3 | South Georgia Tormenta | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8:8 | 7 |
| 4 | Charleston | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6:6 | 5 |
| 5 | Miami FC | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8:9 | 5 |
| 6 | FC Naples | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4:7 | 3 |
Advertisement
Ad Space