Sport Picks
Forward Madison vs Union Omaha
USA
USL Cup Breese Stevens Field 
Kampsammendrag
This USL Cup encounter between Forward Madison and Union Omaha promises to be a closely contested affair, with win probabilities pointing to an even matchup. Forward Madison averages 1.4 goals scored and 1.6 conceded in recent matches. Union Omaha shows a form average of 1.8 goals scored and 1.2 conceded. Given their contrasting recent form profiles, this matchup is expected to produce a balanced tactical flow. Historical head-to-head records show 1 wins for Forward Madison, 3 wins for Union Omaha, and 1 draws in their recent direct meetings. Their last direct encounter on 11.04.26 ended in a 1:0 scoreline. Our model projects an expected goals (xG) output of 1.69 for Forward Madison and 1.44 for Union Omaha, suggesting the primary value lies in the Union Omaha double chance or over markets.
Seierssannsynlighet
Beregnet fra 10 000 simulerte kamper basert på hjemmebanefordel og form
Modellens Sikkerhet
Aggregert sikkerhetsskår
- Forward Madison har tatt flere poeng i det siste sammenlignet med Union Omaha.
- Modellen forventer høyere målfarlighet for vertene (1.69 vs 1.44 xG).
- Historikken viser en tydelig fordel for bortelaget.
- Høy effektivitet tyder på en målrik kamp (Sannsynlighet for Over 2.5: 58%).
Målsannsynlighet
Forventninger for målmarkeder basert på xG-historie
Siste Formanalyse
Snitt per kamp
| Metrikk | Forward Madison | Union Omaha |
|---|---|---|
| Kamper Spilt | 28 | 32 |
| Seire | 12 | 19 |
| Uavgjort | 4 | 3 |
| Tap | 12 | 10 |
| Mål Scoret | 1.36 | 1.75 |
| Mål Sluppet Inn | 1.57 | 1.22 |
| Forventede Mål (xG) | 1.63 | 1.63 |
| Forventede Mål Sluppet Inn (xGA) | 1.25 | 1.75 |
H2H
Historiske suksessrater i nøkkelmarkeder
Taktisk Profil
Posisjonering og Kontrollstil
Forward Madison
Union Omaha
Sokapicks Momentum-Indeks
Akkumulert formindeks justert for motstander og slitasje (0-100)
Angreps- og Forsvarsstyrke
Modell-Prognose
Resultatfrekvenser og hovedmarkeder
Value Bet Finder (+EV)
Spill med statistisk verdi mot bookmakerne
Erventet Kampforløp
Dominanskurver i 15-minutters bolker
Both sides are expected to start cautiously, looking to control the midfield battle.
The game is expected to settle into a tactical block, with both managers looking for space on the flanks.
The tempo could accelerate as both teams push for an opening goal before half-time.
Expect tactical adjustments from both sides, possibly shifting to a wider play style.
As players tire, spaces will open up, leading to transitional counter-attacks for both teams.
A high-risk final phase where any defensive lapse could lead to late drama and decide the match.
Angreps-Heatmaps & Skudd
Varmekart generert fra sone-statistikk
Smart Innsikt
Mønstre oppdaget automatisk av systemet
Forward Madison have found the net in 64% of their last 28 matches.
Union Omaha have conceded at least one goal in 75% of their last 32 fixtures.
Historical meetings between these sides average 2.60 goals per match.
Forward Madison remained undefeated in 4 of their last 5 overall matchups.
Union Omaha suffered defeat in 3 of their last 5 overall games.
Risikoanalyse
Analyse av mulige forstyrrelser og ytre omstendigheter
Fatigue: Match timing requires careful team selection; potential roster adjustments may affect consistency.
Knockout cup fixture where progress is the sole objective; expect high motivation and potential extra time drama.
Match Intensity: High stakes fixture where discipline and tactical patience will be crucial factors.
Teamvergleich
Statistikk-sammenligning
League Standings
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sacramento Republic | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7:1 | 8 |
| 2 | Spokane Velocity | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3:5 | 6 |
| 3 | Athletic Club Boise | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7:6 | 5 |
| 4 | Oakland Roots | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3:3 | 4 |
| 5 | Monterey Bay | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6:7 | 3 |
| 6 | Las Vegas Lights | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1:5 | 1 |
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Colorado Springs | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7:1 | 9 |
| 2 | El Paso Locomotive | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5:3 | 6 |
| 3 | New Mexico | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6:5 | 6 |
| 4 | AV Alta FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3:5 | 3 |
| 5 | Phoenix Rising | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2:6 | 3 |
| 6 | Orange County SC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3:6 | 0 |
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | San Antonio FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4:1 | 8 |
| 2 | Birmingham Legion | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5:2 | 6 |
| 3 | One Knoxville | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4:3 | 4 |
| 4 | FC Tulsa | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3:4 | 4 |
| 5 | Corpus Christi FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1:4 | 3 |
| 6 | Chattanooga Red Wolves | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2:5 | 2 |
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Louisville City | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9:2 | 8 |
| 2 | Indy Eleven | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 7:4 | 7 |
| 3 | Lexington | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6:4 | 6 |
| 4 | Union Omaha | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7:8 | 6 |
| 5 | Detroit City | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2:3 | 5 |
| 6 | Fort Wayne | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5:10 | 1 |
| 7 | Forward Madison | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2:7 | 0 |
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hartford Athletic | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6:2 | 7 |
| 2 | Brooklyn FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8:3 | 6 |
| 3 | Rhode Island | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5:2 | 5 |
| 4 | Portland Hearts of Pine | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5:9 | 4 |
| 5 | New York Cosmos | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4:9 | 3 |
| 6 | Westchester SC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5:8 | 2 |
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Charleston | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7:1 | 8 |
| 2 | Charlotte Independence | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5:2 | 8 |
| 3 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4:3 | 5 |
| 4 | Loudoun United | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4:5 | 3 |
| 5 | Greenville Triumph | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3:5 | 3 |
| 6 | Richmond Kickers | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1:8 | 0 |
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tampa Bay | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8:1 | 9 |
| 2 | Miami FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6:5 | 6 |
| 3 | Sporting Jax | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3:5 | 4 |
| 4 | Sarasota Paradise | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2:4 | 3 |
| 5 | FC Naples | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3:7 | 2 |