Sport Picks
Oklahoma City Energy FC vs Rio Grande Valley FC Toros
Kamphendelser
Kampsammendrag
Oklahoma City Energy FC in this USL Championship 2021 matchup, with the score ending 2-1 — backing the pre-match view that favored Oklahoma City Energy FC.
Seierssannsynlighet
Beregnet fra 10 000 simulerte kamper basert på hjemmebanefordel og form
Modellens Sikkerhet
Aggregert sikkerhetsskår
- Form's been kind to Rio Grande Valley FC Toros lately — more wins on the board than Oklahoma City Energy FC.
- Model gives Rio Grande Valley FC Toros a 80% chance of winning this.
- European nights carry their own weight — this USL Championship 2021 fixture won't be treated like a routine game.
- Sterke forsvar taler for en kontrollert og målfattig kamp.
Målsannsynlighet
Forventninger for målmarkeder basert på xG-historie
Siste Formanalyse
Snitt per kamp
| Metrikk | Oklahoma City Energy FC | Rio Grande Valley FC Toros |
|---|---|---|
| Kamper Spilt | 30 | 35 |
| Seire | 8 | 9 |
| Uavgjort | 13 | 13 |
| Tap | 9 | 13 |
| Mål Scoret | 0 | 1.75 |
| Mål Sluppet Inn | 0 | 1 |
H2H
Historiske suksessrater i nøkkelmarkeder
Nøkkelspiller-Analyse
Toppspillere og forventet involvering
Oklahoma City Energy FC Sammenlign
Rio Grande Valley FC Toros Sammenlign
SokaPicks Momentum-Indeks
Akkumulert formindeks justert for motstander og slitasje (0-100)
Angreps- og Forsvarsstyrke
Modell-Prognose
Resultatfrekvenser og hovedmarkeder
Smart Innsikt
Mønstre oppdaget automatisk av systemet
Attacking prowess: Oklahoma City Energy FC scored in 67% of their last 30 outings.
Rio Grande Valley FC Toros's defensive record shows goals conceded in 77% of 35 matches.
Historical meetings average 2.60 goals per match.
Oklahoma City Energy FC has registered 2 games unbeaten in their last 5 outings.
Måltrender
Recent Form & Match History
Oklahoma City Energy FC
(Home)Rio Grande Valley FC Toros
(Away)League Standings (Group 1)
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Phoenix Rising | 32 | 20 | 7 | 5 | 68:35 | 67 |
| 2 | El Paso Locomotive | 32 | 18 | 10 | 4 | 56:34 | 64 |
| 3 | Orange County SC | 32 | 15 | 7 | 10 | 44:37 | 52 |
| 4 | San Antonio FC | 32 | 14 | 10 | 8 | 50:38 | 52 |
| 5 | Colorado Springs | 32 | 13 | 10 | 9 | 60:50 | 49 |
| 6 | San Diego Loyal | 32 | 14 | 6 | 12 | 51:43 | 48 |
| 7 | Rio Grande Valley FC Toros | 32 | 13 | 8 | 11 | 49:42 | 47 |
| 8 | New Mexico | 32 | 12 | 10 | 10 | 44:40 | 46 |
| 9 | Austin Bold | 32 | 10 | 12 | 10 | 32:42 | 42 |
| 10 | Oakland Roots | 32 | 11 | 8 | 13 | 36:43 | 41 |
| 11 | Ventura County | 32 | 11 | 6 | 15 | 55:57 | 39 |
| 12 | Tacoma Defiance | 32 | 10 | 9 | 13 | 37:41 | 39 |
| 13 | Sacramento Republic | 32 | 8 | 12 | 12 | 36:42 | 36 |
| 14 | Real Monarchs | 32 | 5 | 7 | 20 | 28:56 | 22 |
| 15 | Las Vegas Lights | 32 | 6 | 3 | 23 | 41:77 | 21 |
League Standings (Group 2)
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tampa Bay | 32 | 23 | 2 | 7 | 55:23 | 71 |
| 2 | Louisville City | 32 | 18 | 7 | 7 | 61:37 | 61 |
| 3 | Birmingham Legion | 32 | 18 | 6 | 8 | 51:31 | 60 |
| 4 | Charlotte Independence | 32 | 18 | 5 | 9 | 57:36 | 59 |
| 5 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 32 | 17 | 7 | 8 | 52:34 | 58 |
| 6 | Miami FC | 32 | 16 | 6 | 10 | 55:40 | 54 |
| 7 | Memphis 901 | 32 | 14 | 8 | 10 | 47:42 | 50 |
| 8 | FC Tulsa | 32 | 14 | 5 | 13 | 49:48 | 47 |
| 9 | Hartford Athletic | 32 | 12 | 5 | 15 | 50:50 | 41 |
| 10 | Charleston | 32 | 10 | 7 | 15 | 49:60 | 37 |
| 11 | Oklahoma City Energy FC | 32 | 8 | 13 | 11 | 30:38 | 37 |
| 12 | Indy Eleven | 32 | 9 | 8 | 15 | 32:47 | 35 |
| 13 | Atlanta United 2 | 32 | 8 | 10 | 14 | 47:56 | 34 |
| 14 | New York Red Bulls II | 32 | 7 | 7 | 18 | 42:67 | 28 |
| 15 | Sporting Kansas City II | 32 | 4 | 8 | 20 | 33:64 | 20 |
| 16 | Loudoun United | 32 | 4 | 3 | 25 | 31:78 | 15 |
League Standings (Group 3)
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tampa Bay | 32 | 23 | 2 | 7 | 55:23 | 71 |
| 2 | Charlotte Independence | 32 | 18 | 5 | 9 | 57:36 | 59 |
| 3 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 32 | 17 | 7 | 8 | 52:34 | 58 |
| 4 | Miami FC | 32 | 16 | 6 | 10 | 55:40 | 54 |
| 5 | Hartford Athletic | 32 | 12 | 5 | 15 | 50:50 | 41 |
| 6 | Charleston | 32 | 10 | 7 | 15 | 49:60 | 37 |
| 7 | New York Red Bulls II | 32 | 7 | 7 | 18 | 42:67 | 28 |
| 8 | Loudoun United | 32 | 4 | 3 | 25 | 31:78 | 15 |
League Standings (Group 4)
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Louisville City | 32 | 18 | 7 | 7 | 61:37 | 61 |
| 2 | Birmingham Legion | 32 | 18 | 6 | 8 | 51:31 | 60 |
| 3 | Memphis 901 | 32 | 14 | 8 | 10 | 47:42 | 50 |
| 4 | FC Tulsa | 32 | 14 | 5 | 13 | 49:48 | 47 |
| 5 | Oklahoma City Energy FC | 32 | 8 | 13 | 11 | 30:38 | 37 |
| 6 | Indy Eleven | 32 | 9 | 8 | 15 | 32:47 | 35 |
| 7 | Atlanta United 2 | 32 | 8 | 10 | 14 | 47:56 | 34 |
| 8 | Sporting Kansas City II | 32 | 4 | 8 | 20 | 33:64 | 20 |
League Standings (Group 5)
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Phoenix Rising | 32 | 20 | 7 | 5 | 68:35 | 67 |
| 2 | Orange County SC | 32 | 15 | 7 | 10 | 44:37 | 52 |
| 3 | San Diego Loyal | 32 | 14 | 6 | 12 | 51:43 | 48 |
| 4 | Oakland Roots | 32 | 11 | 8 | 13 | 36:43 | 41 |
| 5 | Ventura County | 32 | 11 | 6 | 15 | 55:57 | 39 |
| 6 | Tacoma Defiance | 32 | 10 | 9 | 13 | 37:41 | 39 |
| 7 | Sacramento Republic | 32 | 8 | 12 | 12 | 36:42 | 36 |
| 8 | Las Vegas Lights | 32 | 6 | 3 | 23 | 41:77 | 21 |
League Standings (Group 6)
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | El Paso Locomotive | 32 | 18 | 10 | 4 | 56:34 | 64 |
| 2 | San Antonio FC | 32 | 14 | 10 | 8 | 50:38 | 52 |
| 3 | Colorado Springs | 32 | 13 | 10 | 9 | 60:50 | 49 |
| 4 | Rio Grande Valley FC Toros | 32 | 13 | 8 | 11 | 49:42 | 47 |
| 5 | New Mexico | 32 | 12 | 10 | 10 | 44:40 | 46 |
| 6 | Austin Bold | 32 | 10 | 12 | 10 | 32:42 | 42 |
| 7 | Real Monarchs | 32 | 5 | 7 | 20 | 28:56 | 22 |