Sport Picks
Match Events
AI Match Summary
Neither side could be separated in this National 2 - Group B 2025/2026 matchup, with the score ending 1-1.
Win Probability Meter
Derived from 10,000 simulations matching home advantage & form profiles
Model Confidence
Aggregate indicator score
- Biesheim have won more games recently than Chantilly.
- Hard to split these two; draw probability sits at 44%.
- Regular National 2 - Group B 2025/2026 form gives a decent read on both sides.
- Strong defensive structures favor a low-scoring, controlled fixture.
Goal Probability Engine
Model estimations for goals markets based on xG conversion histories
Recent Team Form Analysis
Averages per match over historical game filters
| Metric | Chantilly | Biesheim |
|---|---|---|
| Matches Played | 30 | 31 |
| Wins | 7 | 11 |
| Draws | 9 | 10 |
| Losses | 14 | 10 |
| Goals Scored | 1.17 | 1.13 |
| Goals Conceded | 1.57 | 1.29 |
| Expected Goals (xG) | 1.44 | 1.63 |
| Expected Goals Conceded (xGA) | 1.10 | 1.40 |
H2H
Historical prediction success rates across key markets
Key Player Impact Analysis
Key performers and expected goal involvement factors
Chantilly Compare
Biesheim Compare
SokaPicks Momentum Index
Current performance index incorporating opponent strength & fatigue (0-100)
Attack & Defence Capability Index
AI Prediction Engine Forecast
Simulated score frequencies and primary prediction markets
SokaPicks Smart Insights
Historical trends and unique patterns automatically detected by our system
Biesheim's defensive record shows goals conceded in 81% of 31 matches.
Attacking prowess: Chantilly scored in 77% of their last 30 outings.
Games between these two average 3.00 goals.
Biesheim's recent record shows 3 losses from the last 5 matches.
Scoring Trends
Recent Form & Match History
Chantilly
(Home)Biesheim
(Away)League Standings
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thionville | 30 | 18 | 6 | 6 | 53:36 | 60 |
| 2 | Bourges 18 | 30 | 14 | 10 | 6 | 35:24 | 52 |
| 3 | Haguenau | 30 | 14 | 9 | 7 | 43:29 | 51 |
| 4 | Feignies-Aulnoye | 30 | 12 | 10 | 8 | 41:24 | 46 |
| 5 | Furiani Agliani | 30 | 13 | 6 | 11 | 45:40 | 45 |
| 6 | Saint-Pryve | 30 | 12 | 6 | 12 | 48:44 | 42 |
| 7 | Dieppe | 30 | 11 | 8 | 11 | 31:36 | 41 |
| 8 | Borgo | 30 | 11 | 7 | 12 | 32:37 | 40 |
| 9 | Epinal | 30 | 11 | 7 | 12 | 32:37 | 40 |
| 10 | Biesheim | 30 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 31:37 | 39 |
| 11 | Colmar | 30 | 9 | 11 | 10 | 41:43 | 37 |
| 12 | Beauvais | 30 | 9 | 11 | 10 | 39:42 | 35 |
| 13 | Wasquehal | 30 | 10 | 4 | 16 | 28:44 | 34 |
| 14 | Chambly | 30 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 35:35 | 34 |
| 15 | Chantilly | 30 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 32:42 | 27 |
| 16 | Blois Foot 41 | 30 | 7 | 4 | 19 | 31:47 | 25 |
