Sport Picks
Match Events
AI Match Summary
Neither side could be separated in this Regionalliga West 2025/2026 matchup, with the score ending 1-1.
Win Probability Meter
Derived from 10,000 simulations matching home advantage & form profiles
Model Confidence
Aggregate indicator score
- Form's been kind to SC Imst lately — more wins on the board than Hohenems.
- 70% — that's where the model lands on Hohenems taking it.
- Regular Regionalliga West 2025/2026 form gives a decent read on both sides.
- High conversion rates suggest a high-scoring game (Over 2.5 Probability: 87%).
Goal Probability Engine
Model estimations for goals markets based on xG conversion histories
Recent Team Form Analysis
Averages per match over historical game filters
| Metric | Hohenems | SC Imst |
|---|---|---|
| Matches Played | 29 | 29 |
| Wins | 11 | 18 |
| Draws | 7 | 3 |
| Losses | 11 | 8 |
| Goals Scored | 3 | 2.63 |
| Goals Conceded | 2.25 | 1.88 |
| Expected Goals (xG) | 3.00 | 2.63 |
| Expected Goals Conceded (xGA) | 2.25 | 1.88 |
H2H
Historical prediction success rates across key markets
Key Player Impact Analysis
Key performers and expected goal involvement factors
Hohenems Compare
SC Imst Compare
SokaPicks Momentum Index
Current performance index incorporating opponent strength & fatigue (0-100)
Attack & Defence Capability Index
AI Prediction Engine Forecast
Simulated score frequencies and primary prediction markets
SokaPicks Smart Insights
Historical trends and unique patterns automatically detected by our system
Hohenems scored in 79% of their last 29 games.
SC Imst has conceded goals in 72% of their last 29 outings.
Historical meetings average 2.80 goals per match.
Hohenems went unbeaten in 3 of their last 5 games.
Scoring Trends
Recent Form & Match History
Hohenems
(Home)SC Imst
(Away)League Standings
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wacker Innsbruck | 32 | 28 | 2 | 2 | 88:18 | 86 |
| 2 | Kuchl | 32 | 21 | 2 | 9 | 61:43 | 65 |
| 3 | SC Imst | 32 | 19 | 7 | 6 | 71:38 | 64 |
| 4 | Seekirchen | 32 | 19 | 4 | 9 | 83:51 | 61 |
| 5 | Dornbirn | 32 | 16 | 4 | 12 | 62:46 | 52 |
| 6 | Bischofshofen | 32 | 16 | 3 | 13 | 61:49 | 51 |
| 7 | Hohenems | 32 | 12 | 11 | 9 | 60:52 | 47 |
| 8 | Kitzbuhel | 32 | 14 | 4 | 14 | 46:44 | 46 |
| 9 | Reichenau | 32 | 14 | 3 | 15 | 44:55 | 45 |
| 10 | Schwaz | 32 | 13 | 5 | 14 | 57:56 | 44 |
| 11 | Wals-Grunau | 32 | 11 | 8 | 13 | 56:65 | 41 |
| 12 | FC Lustenau | 32 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 49:78 | 34 |
| 13 | Johann | 32 | 9 | 5 | 18 | 45:58 | 32 |
| 14 | Pinzgau Saalfelden | 32 | 7 | 6 | 19 | 26:60 | 27 |
| 15 | Altach U21 | 32 | 7 | 6 | 19 | 35:75 | 27 |
| 16 | Kufstein | 32 | 5 | 10 | 17 | 33:55 | 25 |
| 17 | Lauterach | 32 | 6 | 5 | 21 | 46:80 | 23 |