Sport Picks
AI Match Summary
Nancy W in this Division 2 Women 2013/2014 matchup, with the score ending 0-3 — backing the pre-match view that favored Nancy W.
Win Probability Meter
Derived from 10,000 simulations matching home advantage & form profiles
Model Confidence
Aggregate indicator score
- Nancy W have won more games recently than Mars Bischheim W.
- Nancy W are the model's pick here, at 90%.
- This is a straightforward league game — the season-long numbers should hold up.
- High conversion rates suggest a high-scoring game (Over 2.5 Probability: 78%).
- These two have met 5 times recently and Nancy W have taken 4 of them.
Goal Probability Engine
Model estimations for goals markets based on xG conversion histories
Recent Team Form Analysis
Averages per match over historical game filters
| Metric | Mars Bischheim W | Nancy W |
|---|---|---|
| Matches Played | 30 | 9 |
| Wins | 1 | 3 |
| Draws | 4 | 2 |
| Losses | 25 | 4 |
| Goals Scored | 0.77 | 2.11 |
| Goals Conceded | 4.4 | 2 |
| Expected Goals (xG) | 1.10 | 0.61 |
| Expected Goals Conceded (xGA) | 1.10 | 1.40 |
H2H
Historical prediction success rates across key markets
SokaPicks Momentum Index
Current performance index incorporating opponent strength & fatigue (0-100)
Attack & Defence Capability Index
AI Prediction Engine Forecast
Simulated score frequencies and primary prediction markets
SokaPicks Smart Insights
Historical trends and unique patterns automatically detected by our system
H2H data points to 4.80 goals as a typical output.
Defensive concern: Nancy W conceded in 78% of 9 recent games.
Difficult form: Nancy W registered 4 defeats in their last 5 games.
Attacking prowess: Mars Bischheim W scored in 50% of their last 30 outings.
Scoring Trends
Recent Form & Match History
Mars Bischheim W
(Home)Nancy W
(Away)League Standings (Group 1)
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Metz W | 22 | 19 | 1 | 2 | 71:15 | 80 |
| 2 | Vendenheim W | 22 | 15 | 6 | 1 | 57:11 | 73 |
| 3 | Rouvroy W | 22 | 12 | 3 | 7 | 31:23 | 61 |
| 4 | Compiegne Club Oise W | 22 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 34:20 | 59 |
| 5 | Amiens W | 22 | 10 | 5 | 7 | 46:40 | 57 |
| 6 | Nancy W | 22 | 10 | 4 | 8 | 37:26 | 56 |
| 7 | Lille W | 22 | 9 | 2 | 11 | 53:51 | 51 |
| 8 | Dijon W | 22 | 7 | 5 | 10 | 33:46 | 48 |
| 9 | Mars Bischheim W | 22 | 7 | 4 | 11 | 35:35 | 47 |
| 10 | Val d'Orge W | 22 | 6 | 4 | 12 | 32:44 | 44 |
| 11 | Gravelines W | 22 | 3 | 2 | 17 | 19:77 | 33 |
| 12 | Montigny-le-Bretonneux W | 22 | 3 | 0 | 19 | 23:83 | 31 |
League Standings (Group 2)
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Issy W | 22 | 15 | 6 | 1 | 47:17 | 73 |
| 2 | Saint-Maur W | 22 | 14 | 4 | 4 | 73:26 | 68 |
| 3 | La Roche W | 22 | 14 | 4 | 4 | 52:22 | 68 |
| 4 | Le Mans W | 22 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 48:15 | 64 |
| 5 | Bordeaux W | 22 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 41:26 | 62 |
| 6 | Conde-sur-Noireau W | 22 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 55:37 | 57 |
| 7 | Orvault W | 22 | 8 | 4 | 10 | 30:48 | 50 |
| 8 | Angers W | 22 | 7 | 6 | 9 | 29:31 | 49 |
| 9 | Rouen W | 22 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 27:51 | 43 |
| 10 | Quimper W | 22 | 5 | 4 | 13 | 27:57 | 41 |
| 11 | AS Verchers Foot W | 22 | 1 | 3 | 18 | 16:74 | 28 |
| 12 | Cormelles W | 22 | 1 | 3 | 18 | 17:58 | 28 |
League Standings (Group 3)
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Albi-Marssac W | 22 | 20 | 1 | 1 | 58:13 | 83 |
| 2 | Nimes W | 22 | 14 | 4 | 4 | 40:16 | 68 |
| 3 | Grenoble W | 22 | 12 | 5 | 5 | 59:33 | 63 |
| 4 | Monteux W | 22 | 12 | 4 | 6 | 45:39 | 62 |
| 5 | Toulouse W | 22 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 63:44 | 59 |
| 6 | Aurillac W | 22 | 10 | 3 | 9 | 37:31 | 55 |
| 7 | Le Puy W | 22 | 9 | 5 | 8 | 31:27 | 54 |
| 8 | FAMF Marseille W | 22 | 9 | 4 | 9 | 36:40 | 53 |
| 9 | Veore Montoison W | 22 | 9 | 1 | 12 | 38:40 | 50 |
| 10 | Nivolas W | 22 | 4 | 2 | 16 | 29:57 | 36 |
| 11 | Saint Romain Sanne W | 22 | 3 | 3 | 16 | 20:68 | 34 |
| 12 | Sainte Christie Preignan AS W | 22 | 0 | 2 | 20 | 23:71 | 24 |