Sport Picks
Match Events
AI Match Summary
Neither side could be separated in this USL Championship matchup, with the score ending 3-3.
Win Probability Meter
Derived from 10,000 simulations matching home advantage & form profiles
Model Confidence
Aggregate indicator score
- Form's been kind to Colorado Springs lately — more wins on the board than San Antonio FC.
- Model puts this one close, with a 39% draw probability.
- Continental football usually means sharper preparation from both sides.
- Strong defensive structures favor a low-scoring, controlled fixture.
Goal Probability Engine
Model estimations for goals markets based on xG conversion histories
Recent Team Form Analysis
Averages per match over historical game filters
| Metric | San Antonio FC | Colorado Springs |
|---|---|---|
| Matches Played | 28 | 29 |
| Wins | 14 | 16 |
| Draws | 9 | 5 |
| Losses | 5 | 8 |
| Goals Scored | 1.63 | 1.5 |
| Goals Conceded | 1.38 | 1 |
| Expected Goals (xG) | 1.63 | 1.50 |
| Expected Goals Conceded (xGA) | 1.38 | 1.00 |
H2H
Historical prediction success rates across key markets
Key Player Impact Analysis
Key performers and expected goal involvement factors
San Antonio FC Compare
Colorado Springs Compare
SokaPicks Momentum Index
Current performance index incorporating opponent strength & fatigue (0-100)
Attack & Defence Capability Index
AI Prediction Engine Forecast
Simulated score frequencies and primary prediction markets
SokaPicks Smart Insights
Historical trends and unique patterns automatically detected by our system
Games between these two average 3.40 goals.
Attacking prowess: San Antonio FC scored in 64% of their last 28 outings.
Colorado Springs has conceded goals in 66% of their last 29 outings.
Recent resilience: San Antonio FC stayed unbeaten in 3 of the last 5 games.
Scoring Trends
Recent Form & Match History
San Antonio FC
(Home)Colorado Springs
(Away)League Standings (Group 1)
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tampa Bay | 16 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 25:13 | 32 |
| 2 | Charleston | 16 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 31:22 | 27 |
| 3 | Detroit City | 15 | 8 | 3 | 4 | 23:14 | 27 |
| 4 | Louisville City | 16 | 7 | 3 | 6 | 26:25 | 24 |
| 5 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 15 | 7 | 2 | 6 | 19:18 | 23 |
| 6 | Indy Eleven | 14 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 18:16 | 21 |
| 7 | Miami FC | 17 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 20:26 | 21 |
| 8 | Rhode Island | 14 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 24:18 | 19 |
| 9 | Hartford Athletic | 15 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 12:14 | 19 |
| 10 | Birmingham Legion | 15 | 2 | 8 | 5 | 16:19 | 14 |
| 11 | Brooklyn FC | 15 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 17:26 | 13 |
| 12 | Loudoun United | 15 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 18:29 | 12 |
| 13 | Sporting Jax | 17 | 1 | 5 | 11 | 23:44 | 8 |
League Standings (Group 2)
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Orange County SC | 16 | 7 | 7 | 2 | 25:18 | 28 |
| 2 | San Antonio FC | 16 | 6 | 7 | 3 | 21:19 | 25 |
| 3 | New Mexico | 14 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 19:15 | 24 |
| 4 | Colorado Springs | 15 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 26:22 | 22 |
| 5 | FC Tulsa | 14 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 18:16 | 22 |
| 6 | Lexington | 15 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 24:20 | 21 |
| 7 | Oakland Roots | 16 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 24:24 | 21 |
| 8 | Sacramento Republic | 14 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 16:14 | 20 |
| 9 | Phoenix Rising | 16 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 23:24 | 20 |
| 10 | El Paso Locomotive | 15 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 25:25 | 19 |
| 11 | Las Vegas Lights | 15 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 23:26 | 18 |
| 12 | Monterey Bay | 16 | 4 | 3 | 9 | 16:25 | 15 |