Sport Picks
Beijing Technology vs Nantong Haimen Prediction & H2H Stats
Match Events
AI Match Summary
The League Two game between Beijing Technology and Nantong Haimen finished 1-2, a result that aligned with the model's pre-match lean toward Nantong Haimen.
Win Probability Meter
Derived from 10,000 simulations matching home advantage & form profiles
Model Confidence
Aggregate indicator score
- Nantong Haimen carry the better recent record into this one.
- Model puts this one close, with a 39% draw probability.
- Regular League Two form gives a decent read on both sides.
- Strong defensive structures favor a low-scoring, controlled fixture.
- History favors Nantong Haimen here — 4 wins from the last 5 head-to-heads.
Goal Probability Engine
Model estimations for goals markets based on xG conversion histories
Recent Team Form Analysis
Averages per match over historical game filters
| Metric | Beijing Technology | Nantong Haimen |
|---|---|---|
| Matches Played | 29 | 29 |
| Wins | 7 | 8 |
| Draws | 7 | 13 |
| Losses | 15 | 8 |
| Goals Scored | 1.17 | 1.21 |
| Goals Conceded | 1.76 | 0.97 |
| Expected Goals (xG) | 1.13 | 1.75 |
| Expected Goals Conceded (xGA) | 1.10 | 1.40 |
H2H
Historical prediction success rates across key markets
Key Player Impact Analysis
Key performers and expected goal involvement factors
Beijing Technology Compare
Nantong Haimen Compare
SokaPicks Momentum Index
Current performance index incorporating opponent strength & fatigue (0-100)
Attack & Defence Capability Index
AI Prediction Engine Forecast
Simulated score frequencies and primary prediction markets
SokaPicks Smart Insights
Historical trends and unique patterns automatically detected by our system
Games between these two average 3.80 goals.
Beijing Technology scored in 69% of their last 29 games.
Nantong Haimen's defensive record shows goals conceded in 62% of 29 matches.
Beijing Technology has registered 4 games unbeaten in their last 5 outings.
Scoring Trends
Recent Form & Match History
Beijing Technology
(Home)Nantong Haimen
(Away)League Standings (Group 1)
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shandong Taishan B | 22 | 12 | 5 | 5 | 33:21 | 41 |
| 2 | Shanghai Port B | 22 | 12 | 4 | 6 | 36:19 | 40 |
| 3 | Shanxi Chongde Ronghai | 22 | 12 | 4 | 6 | 29:17 | 40 |
| 4 | Dalian Kewei | 22 | 9 | 10 | 3 | 22:14 | 37 |
| 5 | Taian Tiankuang | 22 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 25:23 | 31 |
| 6 | Dalian Yingbo B | 22 | 6 | 10 | 6 | 21:22 | 28 |
| 7 | Nantong Haimen | 22 | 5 | 11 | 6 | 25:23 | 26 |
| 8 | Lanzhou Longyuan Athletic | 22 | 4 | 14 | 4 | 13:16 | 26 |
| 9 | Qingdao Red Lions | 22 | 5 | 10 | 7 | 22:20 | 25 |
| 10 | Changchun Xidu | 22 | 3 | 11 | 8 | 15:28 | 20 |
| 11 | Beijing Technology | 22 | 3 | 7 | 12 | 21:42 | 16 |
| 12 | Shanghai Second | 22 | 2 | 9 | 11 | 22:39 | 15 |
League Standings (Group 2)
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guizhou Guiyang | 22 | 13 | 3 | 6 | 32:17 | 42 |
| 2 | Shenzhen 2028 | 22 | 10 | 7 | 5 | 37:25 | 37 |
| 3 | Jiangxi Lushan | 22 | 10 | 5 | 7 | 25:19 | 35 |
| 4 | Hangzhou Linping | 22 | 8 | 10 | 4 | 25:28 | 34 |
| 5 | Hubei Istar | 22 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 29:23 | 34 |
| 6 | Xiamen Feilu | 22 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 29:28 | 29 |
| 7 | Guangdong Mingtu | 22 | 5 | 11 | 6 | 22:20 | 26 |
| 8 | Ganzhou Ruishi | 22 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 19:32 | 26 |
| 9 | Guangzhou Dandelion | 22 | 6 | 7 | 9 | 22:28 | 25 |
| 10 | Chengdu Rongcheng B | 22 | 5 | 7 | 10 | 18:24 | 22 |
| 11 | Wenzhou Professional | 22 | 4 | 10 | 8 | 15:23 | 22 |
| 12 | Wuhan Three Towns B | 22 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 20:26 | 19 |