Sport Picks
Beijing Technology vs Qingdao Red Lions
China
League Two Beijing Institute of Technology Stadium 
Match Events
AI Match Summary
Neither side could be separated in this League Two matchup, with the score ending 1-1.
Win Probability Meter
Derived from 10,000 simulations matching home advantage & form profiles
Model Confidence
Aggregate indicator score
- Qingdao Red Lions haven't matched Beijing Technology's recent run of results.
- Qingdao Red Lions are the model's pick here, at 60%.
- This is a straightforward league game — the season-long numbers should hold up.
- Strong defensive structures favor a low-scoring, controlled fixture.
Goal Probability Engine
Model estimations for goals markets based on xG conversion histories
Recent Team Form Analysis
Averages per match over historical game filters
| Metric | Beijing Technology | Qingdao Red Lions |
|---|---|---|
| Matches Played | 28 | 29 |
| Wins | 9 | 5 |
| Draws | 6 | 9 |
| Losses | 13 | 15 |
| Goals Scored | 0.75 | 1 |
| Goals Conceded | 1.5 | 0.75 |
| Expected Goals (xG) | 0.75 | 1.00 |
| Expected Goals Conceded (xGA) | 1.50 | 0.75 |
H2H
Historical prediction success rates across key markets
Key Player Impact Analysis
Key performers and expected goal involvement factors
Beijing Technology Compare
Qingdao Red Lions Compare
Sokapicks Momentum Index
Current performance index incorporating opponent strength & fatigue (0-100)
Attack & Defence Capability Index
Prediction Engine Forecast
Simulated score frequencies and primary prediction markets
Sokapicks Smart Insights
Historical trends and unique patterns automatically detected by our system
Qingdao Red Lions let in goals in 83% of their last 29 matches.
Beijing Technology found the back of the net in 71% of recent matches (28 games).
These sides typically produce 2.40 goals when they meet.
Solid form: Beijing Technology remains unbeaten in 2 of 5 recent matches.
Scoring Trends
League Standings
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shandong Taishan B | 17 | 11 | 2 | 4 | 25:14 | 35 |
| 2 | Shanghai Port B | 16 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 29:10 | 34 |
| 3 | Dalian Kewei | 17 | 7 | 8 | 2 | 14:8 | 29 |
| 4 | Shanxi Chongde Ronghai | 16 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 22:15 | 27 |
| 5 | Taian Tiankuang | 16 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 17:14 | 25 |
| 6 | Dalian Yingbo B | 16 | 4 | 9 | 3 | 15:14 | 21 |
| 7 | Qingdao Red Lions | 17 | 3 | 8 | 6 | 14:16 | 17 |
| 8 | Nantong Haimen | 16 | 2 | 9 | 5 | 16:16 | 15 |
| 9 | Lanzhou Longyuan Athletic | 15 | 2 | 9 | 4 | 5:10 | 15 |
| 10 | Changchun Xidu | 16 | 2 | 8 | 6 | 8:20 | 14 |
| 11 | Shanghai Second | 17 | 2 | 6 | 9 | 16:30 | 12 |
| 12 | Beijing Technology | 15 | 1 | 6 | 8 | 11:25 | 9 |
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guizhou Guiyang | 16 | 10 | 1 | 5 | 23:13 | 31 |
| 2 | Shenzhen 2028 | 17 | 8 | 6 | 3 | 28:21 | 30 |
| 3 | Hubei Istar | 16 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 25:17 | 29 |
| 4 | Ganzhou Ruishi | 17 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 17:15 | 25 |
| 5 | Xiamen Feilu | 16 | 6 | 7 | 3 | 24:17 | 25 |
| 6 | Jiangxi Lushan | 16 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 19:14 | 25 |
| 7 | Hangzhou Linping | 17 | 4 | 9 | 4 | 16:23 | 21 |
| 8 | Guangzhou Dandelion | 17 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 18:23 | 19 |
| 9 | Guangdong Mingtu | 17 | 3 | 9 | 5 | 17:19 | 18 |
| 10 | Wenzhou Professional | 16 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 11:19 | 15 |
| 11 | Chengdu Rongcheng B | 17 | 3 | 6 | 8 | 10:18 | 15 |
| 12 | Wuhan Three Towns B | 16 | 1 | 6 | 9 | 9:18 | 9 |