Sport Picks
Match Events
AI Match Summary
The National 1 - Group A game between Chantilly and Biesheim finished 0-4, a result that aligned with the model's pre-match lean toward Biesheim.
Win Probability Meter
Derived from 10,000 simulations matching home advantage & form profiles
Model Confidence
Aggregate indicator score
- Biesheim carry the better recent record into this one.
- Model gives Biesheim a 85% chance of winning this.
- Regular National 1 - Group A form gives a decent read on both sides.
- High conversion rates suggest a high-scoring game (Over 2.5 Probability: 78%).
Goal Probability Engine
Model estimations for goals markets based on xG conversion histories
Recent Team Form Analysis
Averages per match over historical game filters
| Metric | Chantilly | Biesheim |
|---|---|---|
| Matches Played | 31 | 31 |
| Wins | 6 | 12 |
| Draws | 9 | 9 |
| Losses | 16 | 10 |
| Goals Scored | 1.1 | 1.29 |
| Goals Conceded | 1.71 | 1.26 |
| Expected Goals (xG) | 1.50 | 1.63 |
| Expected Goals Conceded (xGA) | 1.10 | 1.40 |
H2H
Historical prediction success rates across key markets
Key Player Impact Analysis
Key performers and expected goal involvement factors
Chantilly Compare
Biesheim Compare
SokaPicks Momentum Index
Current performance index incorporating opponent strength & fatigue (0-100)
Attack & Defence Capability Index
AI Prediction Engine Forecast
Simulated score frequencies and primary prediction markets
SokaPicks Smart Insights
Historical trends and unique patterns automatically detected by our system
H2H data points to 3.20 goals as a typical output.
Attacking prowess: Chantilly scored in 74% of their last 31 outings.
Defensive concern: Biesheim conceded in 77% of 31 recent games.
Difficult form: Biesheim registered 2 defeats in their last 5 games.
Scoring Trends
Recent Form & Match History
Chantilly
(Home)Biesheim
(Away)League Standings
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Furiani Agliani | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 14:4 | 14 |
| 2 | St. Maur Lusitanos | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 10:5 | 14 |
| 3 | Racing Club de France | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 10:5 | 13 |
| 4 | Feignies-Aulnoye | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 6:3 | 12 |
| 5 | Chambly | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 10:5 | 12 |
| 6 | Creteil | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6:3 | 11 |
| 7 | Dieppe | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 7:6 | 9 |
| 8 | Biesheim | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 11:7 | 8 |
| 9 | Haguenau | 6 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 6:9 | 6 |
| 10 | Montlouis | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6:9 | 6 |
| 11 | Epinal | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5:6 | 5 |
| 12 | USLPV | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 9:11 | 5 |
| 13 | Borgo | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 6:10 | 5 |
| 14 | Colmar | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4:9 | 5 |
| 15 | Saint-Pryve | 6 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 5:8 | 3 |
| 16 | Chantilly | 6 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 4:19 | 1 |
