Sport Picks
Chattanooga Red Wolves vs Birmingham Legion
AI Match Summary
Chattanooga Red Wolves play Birmingham Legion in the USL Cup. It looks like a close match. Recently, Chattanooga Red Wolves averaged 1.24 goals scored and 1.14 conceded. Birmingham Legion averaged 1.22 goals scored and 1.41 conceded. In past meetings, Chattanooga Red Wolves won 1, Birmingham Legion won 4, and they drew 0. Their last match on May 16, 2026 ended 1:2. Our numbers estimate xG of 1.63 for Chattanooga Red Wolves and 1.31 for Birmingham Legion. This points to a Chattanooga Red Wolves double chance or over markets.
Win Probability Meter
Derived from 10,000 simulations matching home advantage & form profiles
Model Confidence
Aggregate indicator score
- Chattanooga Red Wolves picked up more points recently compared to Birmingham Legion.
- Model forecasts higher goal threat for the host (1.63 vs 1.31 xG).
- Past meetings show a clear pattern favoring the home side.
- Strong defensive structures favor a low-scoring, controlled fixture.
Goal Probability Engine
Model estimations for goals markets based on xG conversion histories
Recent Team Form Analysis
Averages per match over historical game filters
| Metric | Chattanooga Red Wolves | Birmingham Legion |
|---|---|---|
| Matches Played | 29 | 27 |
| Wins | 12 | 5 |
| Draws | 4 | 12 |
| Losses | 13 | 10 |
| Goals Scored | 1.24 | 1.22 |
| Goals Conceded | 1.14 | 1.41 |
| Expected Goals (xG) | 2.00 | 1.25 |
| Expected Goals Conceded (xGA) | 1.38 | 1.25 |
H2H
Historical prediction success rates across key markets
Key Player Impact Analysis
Key performers and expected goal involvement factors
Chattanooga Red Wolves Compare
Birmingham Legion Compare
Sokapicks Momentum Index
Current performance index incorporating opponent strength & fatigue (0-100)
Attack & Defence Capability Index
Prediction Engine Forecast
Simulated score frequencies and primary prediction markets
Value Bet Detector (+EV)
Matches where our model probability exceeds implied bookmaker odds
Attacking Heatmaps & Shot Locations
Dynamic heat overlays computed from tactical zone entries
Sokapicks Smart Insights
Historical trends and unique patterns automatically detected by our system
Chattanooga Red Wolves scored in 69% of their last 29 games.
Birmingham Legion let in goals in 78% of their last 27 matches.
Games between these two average 4.20 goals.
Chattanooga Red Wolves went unbeaten in 3 of their last 5 games.
Birmingham Legion lost 2 of their last 5 games.
Interactive Team Comparison Slider
Side-by-side comparison of team metrics
League Standings
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sacramento Republic | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7:1 | 8 |
| 2 | Spokane Velocity | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3:5 | 6 |
| 3 | Athletic Club Boise | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7:6 | 5 |
| 4 | Oakland Roots | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3:3 | 4 |
| 5 | Monterey Bay | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6:7 | 3 |
| 6 | Las Vegas Lights | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1:5 | 1 |
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Colorado Springs | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7:1 | 9 |
| 2 | El Paso Locomotive | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5:3 | 6 |
| 3 | New Mexico | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6:5 | 6 |
| 4 | AV Alta FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3:5 | 3 |
| 5 | Phoenix Rising | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2:6 | 3 |
| 6 | Orange County SC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3:6 | 0 |
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | San Antonio FC | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4:1 | 8 |
| 2 | Birmingham Legion | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5:2 | 6 |
| 3 | One Knoxville | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4:3 | 4 |
| 4 | FC Tulsa | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3:4 | 4 |
| 5 | Corpus Christi FC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1:4 | 3 |
| 6 | Chattanooga Red Wolves | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2:5 | 2 |
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Louisville City | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9:2 | 8 |
| 2 | Indy Eleven | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 7:4 | 7 |
| 3 | Lexington | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6:4 | 6 |
| 4 | Union Omaha | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 7:8 | 6 |
| 5 | Detroit City | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2:3 | 5 |
| 6 | Fort Wayne | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5:10 | 1 |
| 7 | Forward Madison | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2:7 | 0 |
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hartford Athletic | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6:2 | 7 |
| 2 | Brooklyn FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 8:3 | 6 |
| 3 | Rhode Island | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5:2 | 5 |
| 4 | Portland Hearts of Pine | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5:9 | 4 |
| 5 | New York Cosmos | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4:9 | 3 |
| 6 | Westchester SC | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5:8 | 2 |
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Charleston | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7:1 | 8 |
| 2 | Charlotte Independence | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5:2 | 8 |
| 3 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4:3 | 5 |
| 4 | Loudoun United | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4:5 | 3 |
| 5 | Greenville Triumph | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3:5 | 3 |
| 6 | Richmond Kickers | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1:8 | 0 |
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tampa Bay | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8:1 | 9 |
| 2 | Miami FC | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6:5 | 6 |
| 3 | Sporting Jax | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3:5 | 4 |
| 4 | Sarasota Paradise | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2:4 | 3 |
| 5 | FC Naples | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3:7 | 2 |