Sport Picks
Match Events
AI Match Summary
Neither side could be separated in this Ligue 2 matchup, with the score ending 0-0.
Win Probability Meter
Derived from 10,000 simulations matching home advantage & form profiles
Model Confidence
Aggregate indicator score
- Form's been kind to Boulogne lately — more wins on the board than Clermont.
- Clermont are the model's pick here, at 36%.
- This is a straightforward league game — the season-long numbers should hold up.
- Strong defensive structures favor a low-scoring, controlled fixture.
Goal Probability Engine
Model estimations for goals markets based on xG conversion histories
Recent Team Form Analysis
Averages per match over historical game filters
| Metric | Clermont | Boulogne |
|---|---|---|
| Matches Played | 28 | 30 |
| Wins | 6 | 7 |
| Draws | 12 | 12 |
| Losses | 10 | 11 |
| Goals Scored | 1 | 0.77 |
| Goals Conceded | 1.07 | 1.1 |
| Expected Goals (xG) | 0.56 | 0.69 |
| Expected Goals Conceded (xGA) | 1.10 | 1.40 |
H2H
Historical prediction success rates across key markets
SokaPicks Momentum Index
Current performance index incorporating opponent strength & fatigue (0-100)
Attack & Defence Capability Index
AI Prediction Engine Forecast
Simulated score frequencies and primary prediction markets
SokaPicks Smart Insights
Historical trends and unique patterns automatically detected by our system
Attacking prowess: Clermont scored in 64% of their last 28 outings.
H2H data points to 2.20 goals as a typical output.
Solid form: Clermont remains unbeaten in 4 of 5 recent matches.
Boulogne let in goals in 57% of their last 30 matches.
Scoring Trends
Recent Form & Match History
Clermont
(Home)Boulogne
(Away)League Standings
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | St Etienne | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 17:6 | 15 |
| 2 | Reims | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 15:9 | 13 |
| 3 | Montpellier | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 6:5 | 12 |
| 4 | Red Star | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6:6 | 11 |
| 5 | Nancy | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 8:7 | 10 |
| 6 | Annecy | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 9:9 | 10 |
| 7 | Sochaux | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 4:5 | 10 |
| 8 | Metz | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 8:5 | 9 |
| 9 | Dijon | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 10:10 | 9 |
| 10 | Guingamp | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9:9 | 8 |
| 11 | Pau | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 6:6 | 8 |
| 12 | Dunkerque | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 10:12 | 8 |
| 13 | Grenoble | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 8:11 | 8 |
| 14 | Rodez | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 14:16 | 7 |
| 15 | Clermont | 7 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 4:6 | 6 |
| 16 | Boulogne | 6 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 2:3 | 5 |
| 17 | Laval | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 8:14 | 5 |
| 18 | Nantes | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 7:12 | 4 |
