Sport Picks
Match Events
AI Match Summary
Colmar in this National 1 - Group A matchup, with the score ending 1-0 — backing the pre-match view that favored Colmar.
Win Probability Meter
Derived from 10,000 simulations matching home advantage & form profiles
Model Confidence
Aggregate indicator score
- Form's been kind to Biesheim lately — more wins on the board than Colmar.
- Colmar are the model's pick here, at 36%.
- Regular National 1 - Group A form gives a decent read on both sides.
- Strong defensive structures favor a low-scoring, controlled fixture.
Goal Probability Engine
Model estimations for goals markets based on xG conversion histories
Recent Team Form Analysis
Averages per match over historical game filters
| Metric | Colmar | Biesheim |
|---|---|---|
| Matches Played | 29 | 31 |
| Wins | 8 | 11 |
| Draws | 12 | 10 |
| Losses | 9 | 10 |
| Goals Scored | 1.28 | 1.13 |
| Goals Conceded | 1.38 | 1.29 |
| Expected Goals (xG) | 1.19 | 1.31 |
| Expected Goals Conceded (xGA) | 1.10 | 1.40 |
H2H
Historical prediction success rates across key markets
Key Player Impact Analysis
Key performers and expected goal involvement factors
Colmar Compare
Biesheim Compare
SokaPicks Momentum Index
Current performance index incorporating opponent strength & fatigue (0-100)
Attack & Defence Capability Index
AI Prediction Engine Forecast
Simulated score frequencies and primary prediction markets
SokaPicks Smart Insights
Historical trends and unique patterns automatically detected by our system
Defensive concern: Biesheim conceded in 81% of 31 recent games.
Colmar found the back of the net in 76% of recent matches (29 games).
Games between these two average 2.80 goals.
Colmar went unbeaten in 4 of their last 5 games.
Scoring Trends
Recent Form & Match History
Colmar
(Home)Biesheim
(Away)League Standings
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | St. Maur Lusitanos | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 7:4 | 10 |
| 2 | Chambly | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 6:4 | 9 |
| 3 | Racing Club de France | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9:5 | 9 |
| 4 | Dieppe | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5:2 | 8 |
| 5 | Furiani Agliani | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 8:3 | 8 |
| 6 | Creteil | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5:3 | 8 |
| 7 | Haguenau | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5:3 | 6 |
| 8 | Feignies-Aulnoye | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 4:3 | 6 |
| 9 | Epinal | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5:4 | 5 |
| 10 | Colmar | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4:4 | 5 |
| 11 | Montlouis | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3:4 | 3 |
| 12 | Borgo | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4:7 | 2 |
| 13 | Saint-Pryve | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4:6 | 2 |
| 14 | USLPV | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6:9 | 2 |
| 15 | Biesheim | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2:5 | 2 |
| 16 | Chantilly | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4:15 | 1 |
