Sport Picks
Match Events
AI Match Summary
The National 1 - Group A game between Creteil and Chantilly finished 3-1, a result that aligned with the model's pre-match lean toward Creteil.
Win Probability Meter
Derived from 10,000 simulations matching home advantage & form profiles
Model Confidence
Aggregate indicator score
- Creteil carry the better recent record into this one.
- Win probability leans Creteil's way, sitting at 90%.
- This is a straightforward league game — the season-long numbers should hold up.
- Strong defensive structures favor a low-scoring, controlled fixture.
- History favors Creteil here — 4 wins from the last 4 head-to-heads.
Goal Probability Engine
Model estimations for goals markets based on xG conversion histories
Recent Team Form Analysis
Averages per match over historical game filters
| Metric | Creteil | Chantilly |
|---|---|---|
| Matches Played | 29 | 30 |
| Wins | 12 | 7 |
| Draws | 8 | 8 |
| Losses | 9 | 15 |
| Goals Scored | 1.03 | 1.17 |
| Goals Conceded | 0.93 | 1.63 |
| Expected Goals (xG) | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| Expected Goals Conceded (xGA) | 1.10 | 1.40 |
H2H
Historical prediction success rates across key markets
SokaPicks Momentum Index
Current performance index incorporating opponent strength & fatigue (0-100)
Attack & Defence Capability Index
AI Prediction Engine Forecast
Simulated score frequencies and primary prediction markets
SokaPicks Smart Insights
Historical trends and unique patterns automatically detected by our system
Creteil scored in 66% of their last 29 games.
Defensive concern: Chantilly conceded in 77% of 30 recent games.
Historical meetings average 2.75 goals per match.
Recent resilience: Creteil stayed unbeaten in 4 of the last 5 games.
Scoring Trends
Recent Form & Match History
Creteil
(Home)Chantilly
(Away)League Standings
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chambly | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 10:4 | 12 |
| 2 | Furiani Agliani | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 9:3 | 11 |
| 3 | St. Maur Lusitanos | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 7:4 | 11 |
| 4 | Racing Club de France | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9:5 | 10 |
| 5 | Dieppe | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 6:3 | 9 |
| 6 | Feignies-Aulnoye | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 5:3 | 9 |
| 7 | Creteil | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5:3 | 8 |
| 8 | Haguenau | 5 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 5:4 | 6 |
| 9 | Colmar | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4:8 | 5 |
| 10 | Epinal | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5:5 | 5 |
| 11 | Borgo | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5:7 | 5 |
| 12 | Biesheim | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7:7 | 5 |
| 13 | Saint-Pryve | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5:7 | 3 |
| 14 | Montlouis | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5:9 | 3 |
| 15 | USLPV | 5 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 6:10 | 2 |
| 16 | Chantilly | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4:15 | 1 |
