Sport Picks
Match Events
AI Match Summary
Qingdao Red Lions in this League Two matchup, with the score ending 6-1 — backing the pre-match view that favored Qingdao Red Lions.
Win Probability Meter
Derived from 10,000 simulations matching home advantage & form profiles
Model Confidence
Aggregate indicator score
- Attack-wise there's a gap: Beijing Technology at 1.23 per game, Qingdao Red Lions at 1.03.
- Qingdao Red Lions are the model's pick here, at 42%.
- Regular League Two form gives a decent read on both sides.
- Strong defensive structures favor a low-scoring, controlled fixture.
Goal Probability Engine
Model estimations for goals markets based on xG conversion histories
Recent Team Form Analysis
Averages per match over historical game filters
| Metric | Qingdao Red Lions | Beijing Technology |
|---|---|---|
| Matches Played | 30 | 30 |
| Wins | 8 | 8 |
| Draws | 10 | 7 |
| Losses | 12 | 15 |
| Goals Scored | 1.03 | 1.23 |
| Goals Conceded | 1.07 | 1.77 |
| Expected Goals (xG) | 1.75 | 0.81 |
| Expected Goals Conceded (xGA) | 1.10 | 1.40 |
H2H
Historical prediction success rates across key markets
Key Player Impact Analysis
Key performers and expected goal involvement factors
Qingdao Red Lions Compare
Beijing Technology Compare
SokaPicks Momentum Index
Current performance index incorporating opponent strength & fatigue (0-100)
Attack & Defence Capability Index
AI Prediction Engine Forecast
Simulated score frequencies and primary prediction markets
SokaPicks Smart Insights
Historical trends and unique patterns automatically detected by our system
Defensive concern: Beijing Technology conceded in 80% of 30 recent games.
These sides typically produce 3.40 goals when they meet.
Attacking prowess: Qingdao Red Lions scored in 63% of their last 30 outings.
Solid form: Qingdao Red Lions remains unbeaten in 3 of 5 recent matches.
Scoring Trends
Recent Form & Match History
Qingdao Red Lions
(Home)Beijing Technology
(Away)League Standings (Group 1)
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shandong Taishan B | 22 | 12 | 5 | 5 | 33:21 | 41 |
| 2 | Shanghai Port B | 22 | 12 | 4 | 6 | 36:19 | 40 |
| 3 | Shanxi Chongde Ronghai | 22 | 12 | 4 | 6 | 29:17 | 40 |
| 4 | Dalian Kewei | 22 | 9 | 10 | 3 | 22:14 | 37 |
| 5 | Taian Tiankuang | 22 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 25:23 | 31 |
| 6 | Dalian Yingbo B | 22 | 6 | 10 | 6 | 21:22 | 28 |
| 7 | Nantong Haimen | 22 | 5 | 11 | 6 | 25:23 | 26 |
| 8 | Lanzhou Longyuan Athletic | 22 | 4 | 14 | 4 | 13:16 | 26 |
| 9 | Qingdao Red Lions | 22 | 5 | 10 | 7 | 22:20 | 25 |
| 10 | Changchun Xidu | 22 | 3 | 11 | 8 | 15:28 | 20 |
| 11 | Beijing Technology | 22 | 3 | 7 | 12 | 21:42 | 16 |
| 12 | Shanghai Second | 22 | 2 | 9 | 11 | 22:39 | 15 |
League Standings (Group 2)
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guizhou Guiyang | 22 | 13 | 3 | 6 | 32:17 | 42 |
| 2 | Shenzhen 2028 | 22 | 10 | 7 | 5 | 37:25 | 37 |
| 3 | Jiangxi Lushan | 22 | 10 | 5 | 7 | 25:19 | 35 |
| 4 | Hangzhou Linping | 22 | 8 | 10 | 4 | 25:28 | 34 |
| 5 | Hubei Istar | 22 | 9 | 7 | 6 | 29:23 | 34 |
| 6 | Xiamen Feilu | 22 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 29:28 | 29 |
| 7 | Guangdong Mingtu | 22 | 5 | 11 | 6 | 22:20 | 26 |
| 8 | Ganzhou Ruishi | 22 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 19:32 | 26 |
| 9 | Guangzhou Dandelion | 22 | 6 | 7 | 9 | 22:28 | 25 |
| 10 | Chengdu Rongcheng B | 22 | 5 | 7 | 10 | 18:24 | 22 |
| 11 | Wenzhou Professional | 22 | 4 | 10 | 8 | 15:23 | 22 |
| 12 | Wuhan Three Towns B | 22 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 20:26 | 19 |