Sport Picks
AI Match Summary
The Division 2 Women 2014/2015 game between Saint-Maur W and Tremblay FC W finished 6-1, a result that aligned with the model's pre-match lean toward Saint-Maur W.
Win Probability Meter
Derived from 10,000 simulations matching home advantage & form profiles
Model Confidence
Aggregate indicator score
- Tremblay FC W carry the better recent record into this one.
- Tremblay FC W are the model's pick here, at 90%.
- This is a straightforward league game — the season-long numbers should hold up.
- High conversion rates suggest a high-scoring game (Over 2.5 Probability: 78%).
Goal Probability Engine
Model estimations for goals markets based on xG conversion histories
Recent Team Form Analysis
Averages per match over historical game filters
| Metric | Saint-Maur W | Tremblay FC W |
|---|---|---|
| Matches Played | 24 | 30 |
| Wins | 3 | 6 |
| Draws | 4 | 7 |
| Losses | 17 | 17 |
| Goals Scored | 1 | 0 |
| Goals Conceded | 2 | 0 |
H2H
Historical prediction success rates across key markets
SokaPicks Momentum Index
Current performance index incorporating opponent strength & fatigue (0-100)
Attack & Defence Capability Index
AI Prediction Engine Forecast
Simulated score frequencies and primary prediction markets
SokaPicks Smart Insights
Historical trends and unique patterns automatically detected by our system
Tremblay FC W's defensive record shows goals conceded in 90% of 30 matches.
Games between these two average 4.50 goals.
Saint-Maur W scored in 79% of their last 24 games.
Difficult form: Tremblay FC W registered 4 defeats in their last 5 games.
Scoring Trends
Recent Form & Match History
Saint-Maur W
(Home)Tremblay FC W
(Away)League Standings (Group 1)
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Saint-Maur W | 22 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 98:10 | 88 |
| 2 | Henin W | 22 | 17 | 3 | 2 | 67:16 | 76 |
| 3 | Vendenheim W | 22 | 15 | 3 | 4 | 55:15 | 70 |
| 4 | Nancy W | 22 | 10 | 5 | 7 | 45:30 | 57 |
| 5 | Dijon W | 22 | 9 | 4 | 9 | 43:38 | 53 |
| 6 | Tremblay FC W | 22 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 39:39 | 52 |
| 7 | Compiegne Club Oise W | 22 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 26:44 | 45 |
| 8 | Lille W | 22 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 39:50 | 45 |
| 9 | Rouvroy W | 22 | 5 | 4 | 13 | 19:56 | 41 |
| 10 | Lillers W | 22 | 4 | 6 | 12 | 31:58 | 40 |
| 11 | Mars Bischheim W | 22 | 3 | 6 | 13 | 21:51 | 37 |
| 12 | Amiens W | 22 | 2 | 3 | 17 | 13:89 | 31 |
League Standings (Group 2)
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | La Roche W | 22 | 18 | 2 | 2 | 74:20 | 78 |
| 2 | Yzeure Allier W | 22 | 17 | 4 | 1 | 58:9 | 77 |
| 3 | Bordeaux W | 22 | 14 | 4 | 4 | 51:33 | 68 |
| 4 | Le Mans W | 22 | 14 | 3 | 5 | 48:25 | 67 |
| 5 | Rouen W | 22 | 9 | 4 | 9 | 41:38 | 53 |
| 6 | Saint-Malo W | 22 | 9 | 3 | 10 | 38:41 | 52 |
| 7 | Angers W | 22 | 8 | 5 | 9 | 35:42 | 51 |
| 8 | Val d'Orge W | 22 | 7 | 3 | 12 | 39:42 | 46 |
| 9 | Conde-sur-Noireau W | 22 | 5 | 3 | 14 | 38:63 | 40 |
| 10 | Quimper W | 22 | 6 | 0 | 16 | 24:40 | 40 |
| 11 | Orvault W | 22 | 4 | 2 | 16 | 24:59 | 36 |
| 12 | Tours W | 22 | 4 | 1 | 17 | 30:88 | 35 |
League Standings (Group 3)
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nimes W | 22 | 17 | 2 | 3 | 48:15 | 75 |
| 2 | Marseille W | 22 | 14 | 6 | 2 | 48:22 | 70 |
| 3 | Le Puy W | 22 | 13 | 5 | 4 | 39:19 | 66 |
| 4 | Toulouse W | 22 | 12 | 4 | 6 | 54:24 | 62 |
| 5 | Grenoble W | 22 | 12 | 2 | 8 | 60:36 | 60 |
| 6 | Monteux W | 22 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 40:33 | 59 |
| 7 | FAMF Marseille W | 22 | 9 | 3 | 10 | 49:52 | 52 |
| 8 | Aurillac W | 22 | 9 | 1 | 12 | 38:39 | 50 |
| 9 | Veore Montoison W | 22 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 22:37 | 45 |
| 10 | Nivolas W | 22 | 4 | 6 | 12 | 13:36 | 40 |
| 11 | Muretaine W | 22 | 3 | 3 | 16 | 24:55 | 34 |
| 12 | US Blanzy Foot W | 22 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 12:79 | 26 |