Sport Picks
Match Events
AI Match Summary
Neither side could be separated in this USL 2016 matchup, with the score ending 1-1.
Win Probability Meter
Derived from 10,000 simulations matching home advantage & form profiles
Model Confidence
Aggregate indicator score
- San Antonio FC have won more games recently than Arizona United.
- Model gives San Antonio FC a 80% chance of winning this.
- Regular USL 2016 form gives a decent read on both sides.
- High conversion rates suggest a high-scoring game (Over 2.5 Probability: 78%).
Goal Probability Engine
Model estimations for goals markets based on xG conversion histories
Recent Team Form Analysis
Averages per match over historical game filters
| Metric | San Antonio FC | Arizona United |
|---|---|---|
| Matches Played | 32 | 30 |
| Wins | 16 | 9 |
| Draws | 10 | 7 |
| Losses | 6 | 14 |
| Goals Scored | 1.13 | 0 |
| Goals Conceded | 1 | 0 |
H2H
Historical prediction success rates across key markets
Key Player Impact Analysis
Key performers and expected goal involvement factors
San Antonio FC Compare
Arizona United Compare
SokaPicks Momentum Index
Current performance index incorporating opponent strength & fatigue (0-100)
Attack & Defence Capability Index
AI Prediction Engine Forecast
Simulated score frequencies and primary prediction markets
SokaPicks Smart Insights
Historical trends and unique patterns automatically detected by our system
Defensive concern: Arizona United conceded in 80% of 30 recent games.
San Antonio FC scored in 66% of their last 32 games.
Historical meetings average 2.67 goals per match.
San Antonio FC has registered 4 games unbeaten in their last 5 outings.
Scoring Trends
Recent Form & Match History
San Antonio FC
(Home)Arizona United
(Away)League Standings (Group 1)
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sacramento Republic | 30 | 14 | 10 | 6 | 43:27 | 52 |
| 2 | Rio Grande Valley FC Toros | 30 | 14 | 9 | 7 | 47:24 | 51 |
| 3 | Colorado Springs | 30 | 14 | 7 | 9 | 37:27 | 49 |
| 4 | Sporting Kansas City II | 30 | 14 | 6 | 10 | 45:36 | 48 |
| 5 | Ventura County | 30 | 12 | 11 | 7 | 52:42 | 47 |
| 6 | Vancouver Whitecaps 2 | 30 | 12 | 9 | 9 | 44:44 | 45 |
| 7 | Oklahoma City Energy FC | 30 | 10 | 13 | 7 | 32:30 | 43 |
| 8 | Orange County SC | 30 | 12 | 4 | 14 | 39:41 | 40 |
| 9 | Portland Timbers 2 | 30 | 12 | 4 | 14 | 38:42 | 40 |
| 10 | San Antonio FC | 30 | 10 | 8 | 12 | 36:36 | 38 |
| 11 | Real Monarchs | 30 | 10 | 6 | 14 | 31:41 | 36 |
| 12 | Tacoma Defiance | 30 | 9 | 8 | 13 | 35:50 | 35 |
| 13 | Arizona United | 30 | 9 | 7 | 14 | 40:46 | 34 |
| 14 | St. Louis FC | 30 | 8 | 10 | 12 | 42:44 | 34 |
| 15 | FC Tulsa | 30 | 5 | 4 | 21 | 25:64 | 19 |
League Standings (Group 2)
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | New York Red Bulls II | 30 | 21 | 6 | 3 | 61:21 | 69 |
| 2 | Louisville City | 30 | 17 | 9 | 4 | 52:27 | 60 |
| 3 | FC Cincinnati | 30 | 16 | 8 | 6 | 41:27 | 56 |
| 4 | Rochester New York | 30 | 13 | 12 | 5 | 38:25 | 51 |
| 5 | Charlotte Independence | 30 | 14 | 8 | 8 | 48:29 | 50 |
| 6 | Charleston | 30 | 13 | 9 | 8 | 38:33 | 48 |
| 7 | Richmond Kickers | 30 | 12 | 9 | 9 | 33:26 | 45 |
| 8 | Orlando City B | 30 | 9 | 8 | 13 | 35:49 | 35 |
| 9 | Wilmington Hammerheads | 30 | 8 | 10 | 12 | 37:47 | 34 |
| 10 | Penn Football Club | 30 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 37:54 | 31 |
| 11 | Bethlehem Steel FC | 30 | 6 | 10 | 14 | 32:43 | 28 |
| 12 | Toronto FC II | 30 | 7 | 5 | 18 | 36:58 | 26 |
| 13 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 30 | 6 | 7 | 17 | 31:50 | 25 |
| 14 | FC Montreal | 30 | 7 | 2 | 21 | 35:57 | 23 |