Sport Picks
Charleston vs FC Tulsa
USA
USL Championship Patriots Point Soccer Complex 
AI Match Summary
This USL Championship encounter between Charleston and FC Tulsa promises to be a closely contested affair, with win probabilities pointing to an even matchup. Charleston averages 1.8 goals scored and 1.4 conceded in recent matches. FC Tulsa shows a form average of 1.4 goals scored and 1.0 conceded. Given their contrasting recent form profiles, this matchup is expected to produce a balanced tactical flow. Historical head-to-head records show 4 wins for Charleston, 1 wins for FC Tulsa, and 0 draws in their recent direct meetings. Their last direct encounter on 13.06.26 ended in a 5:1 scoreline. Our model projects an expected goals (xG) output of 2.06 for Charleston and 1.00 for FC Tulsa, suggesting the primary value lies in the Charleston double chance or over markets.
Win Probability Meter
Derived from 10,000 simulations matching home advantage & form profiles
Model Confidence
Aggregate indicator score
- Charleston picked up more points recently compared to FC Tulsa.
- Model forecasts higher goal threat for the host (2.06 vs 1.00 xG).
- Past meetings show a clear pattern favoring the home side.
- High conversion rates suggest a high-scoring game (Over 2.5 Probability: 57%).
Goal Probability Engine
Model estimations for goals markets based on xG conversion histories
Recent Team Form Analysis
Averages per match over historical game filters
| Metric | Charleston | FC Tulsa |
|---|---|---|
| Matches Played | 27 | 28 |
| Wins | 14 | 14 |
| Draws | 3 | 6 |
| Losses | 10 | 8 |
| Goals Scored | 1.81 | 1.39 |
| Goals Conceded | 1.37 | 1 |
| Expected Goals (xG) | 2.88 | 1.25 |
| Expected Goals Conceded (xGA) | 0.75 | 1.25 |
| Possession % | N/A | N/A |
| Shots per Match | N/A | N/A |
| Shots on Target | N/A | N/A |
| Corners per Match | N/A | N/A |
| Yellow/Red Cards | N/A | N/A |
H2H
Historical prediction success rates across key markets
Tactical Matchup Profile
Field Positions & Control Styles
Charleston
FC Tulsa
Key Player Impact Analysis
Key performers and expected goal involvement factors
Charleston Compare
FC Tulsa Compare
Availability Alerts
Sokapicks Momentum Index
Current performance index incorporating opponent strength & fatigue (0-100)
Attack & Defence Capability Index
Prediction Engine Forecast
Simulated score frequencies and primary prediction markets
Value Bet Detector (+EV)
Matches where our model probability exceeds implied bookmaker odds
Expected Match Flow Timeline
Dominance and pressure projections by 15-minute intervals
Both sides are expected to start cautiously, looking to control the midfield battle.
The game is expected to settle into a tactical block, with both managers looking for space on the flanks.
The tempo could accelerate as both teams push for an opening goal before half-time.
Expect tactical adjustments from both sides, possibly shifting to a wider play style.
As players tire, spaces will open up, leading to transitional counter-attacks for both teams.
A high-risk final phase where any defensive lapse could lead to late drama and decide the match.
Attacking Heatmaps & Shot Locations
Dynamic heat overlays computed from tactical zone entries
Sokapicks Smart Insights
Historical trends and unique patterns automatically detected by our system
Charleston have found the net in 78% of their last 27 matches.
FC Tulsa have conceded at least one goal in 54% of their last 28 fixtures.
Historical meetings between these sides average 4.00 goals per match.
Charleston remained undefeated in 4 of their last 5 overall matchups.
FC Tulsa suffered defeat in 3 of their last 5 overall games.
Match Risk Analysis
Assessing potential disruptors and external variables affecting prediction reliability
Fatigue: Match timing requires careful team selection; potential roster adjustments may affect consistency.
Standard league campaign fixture. Both teams have strong incentives to secure maximum points for table positioning.
Match Intensity: High stakes fixture where discipline and tactical patience will be crucial factors.
Public Accuracy Dashboard
History Log Unavailable
Historical prediction accuracy logs and success dashboards require a live connection to a completed tips outcome database. This section is currently flagged as: Needs a Real Data Source.
Interactive Team Comparison Slider
Side-by-side comparison of team metrics
League Standings
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tampa Bay | 15 | 9 | 4 | 2 | 24:12 | 31 |
| 2 | Charleston | 15 | 8 | 2 | 5 | 30:21 | 26 |
| 3 | Detroit City | 14 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 21:14 | 24 |
| 4 | Louisville City | 15 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 25:22 | 24 |
| 5 | Indy Eleven | 12 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 18:12 | 21 |
| 6 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 13 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 15:15 | 20 |
| 7 | Hartford Athletic | 13 | 4 | 6 | 3 | 10:11 | 18 |
| 8 | Miami FC | 14 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 17:23 | 17 |
| 9 | Rhode Island | 12 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 22:16 | 16 |
| 10 | Birmingham Legion | 14 | 2 | 7 | 5 | 15:18 | 13 |
| 11 | Brooklyn FC | 14 | 3 | 3 | 8 | 15:24 | 12 |
| 12 | Loudoun United | 14 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 17:28 | 11 |
| 13 | Sporting Jax | 15 | 0 | 4 | 11 | 19:41 | 4 |
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Orange County SC | 15 | 7 | 6 | 2 | 23:16 | 27 |
| 2 | San Antonio FC | 15 | 6 | 7 | 2 | 20:17 | 25 |
| 3 | New Mexico | 13 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 15:14 | 21 |
| 4 | Oakland Roots | 15 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 24:22 | 21 |
| 5 | Colorado Springs | 14 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 24:22 | 19 |
| 6 | El Paso Locomotive | 14 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 25:24 | 19 |
| 7 | FC Tulsa | 13 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 17:16 | 19 |
| 8 | Lexington | 13 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 21:16 | 18 |
| 9 | Phoenix Rising | 15 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 20:22 | 17 |
| 10 | Sacramento Republic | 12 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 13:12 | 16 |
| 11 | Las Vegas Lights | 14 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 21:25 | 15 |
| 12 | Monterey Bay | 15 | 4 | 3 | 8 | 14:22 | 15 |