Sport Picks
AI Match Summary
Neither side could be separated in this Division 2 Women 2010/2011 matchup, with the score ending 1-1.
Win Probability Meter
Derived from 10,000 simulations matching home advantage & form profiles
Model Confidence
Aggregate indicator score
- Chatenoy W haven't matched Grenoble W's recent run of results.
- 42% — that's where the model lands on Grenoble W taking it.
- Regular Division 2 Women 2010/2011 form gives a decent read on both sides.
- High conversion rates suggest a high-scoring game (Over 2.5 Probability: 78%).
- These two have met 4 times recently and Grenoble W have taken 3 of them.
Goal Probability Engine
Model estimations for goals markets based on xG conversion histories
Recent Team Form Analysis
Averages per match over historical game filters
| Metric | Chatenoy W | Grenoble W |
|---|---|---|
| Matches Played | 33 | 52 |
| Wins | 7 | 27 |
| Draws | 4 | 8 |
| Losses | 22 | 17 |
| Goals Scored | 1.36 | 2.52 |
| Goals Conceded | 3 | 1.33 |
| Expected Goals (xG) | 1.10 | 1.05 |
| Expected Goals Conceded (xGA) | 1.10 | 1.40 |
H2H
Historical prediction success rates across key markets
SokaPicks Momentum Index
Current performance index incorporating opponent strength & fatigue (0-100)
Attack & Defence Capability Index
AI Prediction Engine Forecast
Simulated score frequencies and primary prediction markets
SokaPicks Smart Insights
Historical trends and unique patterns automatically detected by our system
Historical meetings average 4.75 goals per match.
Chatenoy W found the back of the net in 73% of recent matches (33 games).
Grenoble W's defensive record shows goals conceded in 77% of 52 matches.
Grenoble W lost 4 of their last 5 games.
Scoring Trends
Recent Form & Match History
Chatenoy W
(Home)Grenoble W
(Away)League Standings (Group 1)
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vendenheim W | 22 | 20 | 1 | 1 | 64:15 | 83 |
| 2 | Dijon W | 22 | 13 | 5 | 4 | 40:21 | 66 |
| 3 | Arras W | 22 | 12 | 5 | 5 | 40:30 | 63 |
| 4 | Bagneux W | 22 | 10 | 10 | 2 | 41:16 | 62 |
| 5 | Mars Bischheim W | 22 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 36:38 | 59 |
| 6 | Gravelines W | 22 | 8 | 5 | 9 | 33:32 | 51 |
| 7 | Metz W | 22 | 8 | 5 | 9 | 34:31 | 51 |
| 8 | Compiegne Club Oise W | 22 | 7 | 6 | 9 | 26:33 | 49 |
| 9 | Rouen W | 22 | 5 | 5 | 12 | 25:35 | 42 |
| 10 | Cormelles W | 22 | 6 | 1 | 15 | 30:49 | 41 |
| 11 | Leers OS W | 22 | 3 | 6 | 13 | 23:47 | 37 |
| 12 | Lille W | 22 | 1 | 3 | 18 | 21:66 | 28 |
League Standings (Group 2)
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Soyaux W | 22 | 17 | 2 | 3 | 69:18 | 75 |
| 2 | Issy W | 22 | 15 | 3 | 4 | 54:33 | 70 |
| 3 | Conde-sur-Noireau W | 22 | 13 | 4 | 5 | 54:26 | 65 |
| 4 | Montigny-le-Bretonneux W | 22 | 13 | 1 | 8 | 56:42 | 62 |
| 5 | Orvault W | 22 | 10 | 5 | 7 | 46:32 | 57 |
| 6 | Angers W | 22 | 9 | 2 | 11 | 40:45 | 51 |
| 7 | USC Corne W | 22 | 8 | 5 | 9 | 32:37 | 51 |
| 8 | Rennes W | 22 | 7 | 2 | 13 | 23:43 | 45 |
| 9 | Tours W | 22 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 31:53 | 45 |
| 10 | Bordeaux W | 22 | 6 | 3 | 13 | 28:45 | 43 |
| 11 | Merignac W | 22 | 6 | 1 | 15 | 35:56 | 41 |
| 12 | Limoges Landouge Foot W | 22 | 5 | 1 | 16 | 28:66 | 38 |
League Standings (Group 3)
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Muretaine W | 22 | 17 | 5 | 0 | 77:21 | 78 |
| 2 | Monteux W | 22 | 13 | 6 | 3 | 47:19 | 67 |
| 3 | Albi-Marssac W | 22 | 12 | 6 | 4 | 54:21 | 64 |
| 4 | Veore Montoison W | 22 | 10 | 6 | 6 | 41:39 | 58 |
| 5 | Grenoble W | 22 | 9 | 5 | 8 | 41:26 | 54 |
| 6 | Macon W | 22 | 9 | 5 | 8 | 29:30 | 54 |
| 7 | Nimes W | 22 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 20:20 | 52 |
| 8 | Aurillac W | 22 | 8 | 3 | 11 | 35:47 | 49 |
| 9 | US Blanzy Foot W | 22 | 7 | 2 | 13 | 44:66 | 45 |
| 10 | Chatenoy W | 22 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 25:59 | 41 |
| 11 | Besancon RC W | 22 | 5 | 3 | 14 | 27:48 | 40 |
| 12 | Aulnat Sportif W | 22 | 1 | 4 | 17 | 21:65 | 29 |