Sport Picks

Stadium Background

Skive vs Naestved IF

Denmark Denmark

2nd Division
Our Tip

Match Events

28' Event
Cordua C.
69' Event
Christensen F.
90' Event
Bryld A.

AI Match Summary

The 2nd Division game between Skive and Naestved IF finished 1-2, a result that aligned with the model's pre-match lean toward Naestved IF.

Win Probability Meter

Derived from 10,000 simulations matching home advantage & form profiles

25%
Skive
35%
Draws
40%
Naestved IF
Draw rate projection: 35% Favored: Naestved IF

Model Confidence

Aggregate indicator score

40% / Low Confidence
  • Look at the last few games and Naestved IF come out ahead of Skive on wins alone.
  • 40% — that's where the model lands on Naestved IF taking it.
  • Regular 2nd Division form gives a decent read on both sides.
  • Strong defensive structures favor a low-scoring, controlled fixture.

Goal Probability Engine

Model estimations for goals markets based on xG conversion histories

Over 0.5 Goals 85%
Over 1.5 Goals 75%
Over 2.5 Goals 25%
Over 3.5 Goals 22%
Over 4.5 Goals 10%
Both Teams To Score (BTTS) 34%
Skive Clean Sheet 15%
Naestved IF Clean Sheet 68%

Recent Team Form Analysis

Averages per match over historical game filters

Metric Skive Naestved IF
Matches Played 31 29
Wins 9 11
Draws 12 10
Losses 10 8
Goals Scored 1.35 1.24
Goals Conceded 1.35 1.21
Expected Goals (xG) 1.06 1.56
Expected Goals Conceded (xGA) 1.10 1.40

H2H

Historical prediction success rates across key markets

Aug 30, 2026 2nd Division
Skive vs Naestved IF
1:2
Mar 21, 2026 2nd Division
Skive vs Naestved IF
0:0
Sep 28, 2025 2nd Division
Naestved IF vs Skive
2:0
Jun 1, 2025 2nd Division
Naestved IF vs Skive
1:3
Apr 27, 2025 2nd Division
Skive vs Naestved IF
0:2

Key Player Impact Analysis

Key performers and expected goal involvement factors

Skive Compare

Top Goalscorer Bryld A.
1 Goals
Avg xG / game 0.82
Avg xA / game 0.53

Naestved IF Compare

Top Goalscorer Cordua C.
1 Goals
Assists Leader Christensen F.
1 Ast
Avg xG / game 1.42
Avg xA / game 0.87

SokaPicks Momentum Index

Current performance index incorporating opponent strength & fatigue (0-100)

Skive 23 / 100
Naestved IF 59 / 100
How it's calculated: Weighted formula of recent form points (60%), goal margin trends (20%), home/away adjustments (10%), and squad impact availability ratings (10%).

Attack & Defence Capability Index

ATTACK DEFENCE POSSESSION DISCIPLINE
Skive Naestved IF

AI Prediction Engine Forecast

Simulated score frequencies and primary prediction markets

Primary Pick Naestved IF Win (2)
Secondary Pick Under 2.5 Goals or BTTS No
Correct Score 0:1
BTTS Outcome No (NG)
Over/Under Pick Under 2.5

SokaPicks Smart Insights

Historical trends and unique patterns automatically detected by our system

Skive's goal record stands at 74% scoring rate across 31 recent games.

Naestved IF's defensive record shows goals conceded in 69% of 29 matches.

H2H data points to 2.20 goals as a typical output.

Skive has registered 3 games unbeaten in their last 5 outings.

Scoring Trends

Skive VS Naestved IF
1.13 Goals Scored 1.25
1.88 Goals Conceded 1
75% Over 1.5 75%
63% Over 2.5 38%
38% Over 3.5 13%

Recent Form & Match History

Skive

(Home)
26 Sept
VSK Aarhus
1 : 0
Skive
18 Sept
Skive
2 : 1
Boldklubben 1893
13 Sept
Skive
0 : 0
Middelfart
05 Sept
Frederiksberg Alliancen 2000
2 : 2
Skive
30 Aug
Skive
1 : 2
Naestved IF
Page 1 of 7

Naestved IF

(Away)
18 Sept
Fremad Amager
1 : 1
Naestved IF
13 Sept
Naestved IF
3 : 1
Thisted FC
04 Sept
Boldklubben 1893
1 : 1
Naestved IF
30 Aug
Skive
1 : 2
Naestved IF
23 Aug
Naestved IF
0 : 2
VSK Aarhus
Page 1 of 6

League Standings

Pos Team P W D L GD Pts
1 Nykobing 9 6 3 0 24:10 21
2 VSK Aarhus 9 5 3 1 14:5 18
3 Roskilde 9 3 6 0 16:10 15
4 Fremad Amager 9 3 5 1 13:12 14
5 Middelfart 8 3 4 1 15:8 13
6 Naestved IF 8 3 4 1 11:9 13
7 Boldklubben 1893 9 3 3 3 13:13 12
8 Skive 9 3 2 4 11:12 11
9 Hellerup 9 2 2 5 8:16 8
10 Brabrand 9 1 3 5 10:18 6
11 Frederiksberg Alliancen 2000 9 1 2 6 10:21 5
12 Thisted FC 9 1 1 7 8:19 4
Promotion - 2nd Division (Promotion Group)
Relegation - 2nd Division (Relegation Group)