Sport Picks
AI Match Summary
Neither side could be separated in this Division 2 Women 2010/2011 matchup, with the score ending 2-2.
Win Probability Meter
Derived from 10,000 simulations matching home advantage & form profiles
Model Confidence
Aggregate indicator score
- Form's been kind to Albi-Marssac W lately — more wins on the board than Chatenoy W.
- Win probability leans Albi-Marssac W's way, sitting at 60%.
- Regular Division 2 Women 2010/2011 form gives a decent read on both sides.
- High conversion rates suggest a high-scoring game (Over 2.5 Probability: 82%).
- Albi-Marssac W have won 3 of the last 4 meetings between these two.
Goal Probability Engine
Model estimations for goals markets based on xG conversion histories
Recent Team Form Analysis
Averages per match over historical game filters
| Metric | Albi-Marssac W | Chatenoy W |
|---|---|---|
| Matches Played | 33 | 30 |
| Wins | 12 | 5 |
| Draws | 6 | 3 |
| Losses | 15 | 22 |
| Goals Scored | 1 | 1.67 |
| Goals Conceded | 2.13 | 1.67 |
| Expected Goals (xG) | 1.00 | 1.67 |
| Expected Goals Conceded (xGA) | 2.13 | 1.67 |
H2H
Historical prediction success rates across key markets
Sokapicks Momentum Index
Current performance index incorporating opponent strength & fatigue (0-100)
Attack & Defence Capability Index
Prediction Engine Forecast
Simulated score frequencies and primary prediction markets
Sokapicks Smart Insights
Historical trends and unique patterns automatically detected by our system
Defensive concern: Chatenoy W conceded in 97% of 30 recent games.
These sides typically produce 4.25 goals when they meet.
Albi-Marssac W scored in 76% of their last 33 games.
Difficult form: Chatenoy W registered 4 defeats in their last 5 games.
Scoring Trends
League Standings
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vendenheim W | 22 | 20 | 1 | 1 | 64:15 | 83 |
| 2 | Dijon W | 22 | 13 | 5 | 4 | 40:21 | 66 |
| 3 | Arras W | 22 | 12 | 5 | 5 | 40:30 | 63 |
| 4 | Bagneux W | 22 | 10 | 10 | 2 | 41:16 | 62 |
| 5 | Mars Bischheim W | 22 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 36:38 | 59 |
| 6 | Gravelines W | 22 | 8 | 5 | 9 | 33:32 | 51 |
| 7 | Metz W | 22 | 8 | 5 | 9 | 34:31 | 51 |
| 8 | Compiegne Club Oise W | 22 | 7 | 6 | 9 | 26:33 | 49 |
| 9 | Rouen W | 22 | 5 | 5 | 12 | 25:35 | 42 |
| 10 | Cormelles W | 22 | 6 | 1 | 15 | 30:49 | 41 |
| 11 | Leers OS W | 22 | 3 | 6 | 13 | 23:47 | 37 |
| 12 | Lille W | 22 | 1 | 3 | 18 | 21:66 | 28 |
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Soyaux W | 22 | 17 | 2 | 3 | 69:18 | 75 |
| 2 | Issy W | 22 | 15 | 3 | 4 | 54:33 | 70 |
| 3 | Conde-sur-Noireau W | 22 | 13 | 4 | 5 | 54:26 | 65 |
| 4 | Montigny-le-Bretonneux W | 22 | 13 | 1 | 8 | 56:42 | 62 |
| 5 | Orvault W | 22 | 10 | 5 | 7 | 46:32 | 57 |
| 6 | Angers W | 22 | 9 | 2 | 11 | 40:45 | 51 |
| 7 | USC Corne W | 22 | 8 | 5 | 9 | 32:37 | 51 |
| 8 | Rennes W | 22 | 7 | 2 | 13 | 23:43 | 45 |
| 9 | Tours W | 22 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 31:53 | 45 |
| 10 | Bordeaux W | 22 | 6 | 3 | 13 | 28:45 | 43 |
| 11 | Merignac W | 22 | 6 | 1 | 15 | 35:56 | 41 |
| 12 | Limoges Landouge Foot W | 22 | 5 | 1 | 16 | 28:66 | 38 |
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Muretaine W | 22 | 17 | 5 | 0 | 77:21 | 78 |
| 2 | Monteux W | 22 | 13 | 6 | 3 | 47:19 | 67 |
| 3 | Albi-Marssac W | 22 | 12 | 6 | 4 | 54:21 | 64 |
| 4 | Veore Montoison W | 22 | 10 | 6 | 6 | 41:39 | 58 |
| 5 | Grenoble W | 22 | 9 | 5 | 8 | 41:26 | 54 |
| 6 | Macon W | 22 | 9 | 5 | 8 | 29:30 | 54 |
| 7 | Nimes W | 22 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 20:20 | 52 |
| 8 | Aurillac W | 22 | 8 | 3 | 11 | 35:47 | 49 |
| 9 | US Blanzy Foot W | 22 | 7 | 2 | 13 | 44:66 | 45 |
| 10 | Chatenoy W | 22 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 25:59 | 41 |
| 11 | Besancon RC W | 22 | 5 | 3 | 14 | 27:48 | 40 |
| 12 | Aulnat Sportif W | 22 | 1 | 4 | 17 | 21:65 | 29 |