Sport Picks
Match Events
AI Match Summary
Burgess Hill in this Isthmian League Premier Division 2025/2026 matchup, with the score ending 4-2 — backing the pre-match view that favored Burgess Hill.
Win Probability Meter
Derived from 10,000 simulations matching home advantage & form profiles
Model Confidence
Aggregate indicator score
- Form's been kind to Burgess Hill lately — more wins on the board than Cray Wanderers.
- Win probability leans Burgess Hill's way, sitting at 40%.
- Regular Isthmian League Premier Division 2025/2026 form gives a decent read on both sides.
- High conversion rates suggest a high-scoring game (Over 2.5 Probability: 78%).
Goal Probability Engine
Model estimations for goals markets based on xG conversion histories
Recent Team Form Analysis
Averages per match over historical game filters
| Metric | Burgess Hill | Cray Wanderers |
|---|---|---|
| Matches Played | 29 | 28 |
| Wins | 15 | 12 |
| Draws | 5 | 9 |
| Losses | 9 | 7 |
| Goals Scored | 1.66 | 1.96 |
| Goals Conceded | 1.45 | 1.54 |
| Expected Goals (xG) | 1.44 | 1.44 |
| Expected Goals Conceded (xGA) | 1.10 | 1.40 |
H2H
Historical prediction success rates across key markets
Key Player Impact Analysis
Key performers and expected goal involvement factors
Burgess Hill Compare
Cray Wanderers Compare
SokaPicks Momentum Index
Current performance index incorporating opponent strength & fatigue (0-100)
Attack & Defence Capability Index
AI Prediction Engine Forecast
Simulated score frequencies and primary prediction markets
SokaPicks Smart Insights
Historical trends and unique patterns automatically detected by our system
H2H data points to 5.33 goals as a typical output.
Recent resilience: Burgess Hill stayed unbeaten in 5 of the last 5 games.
Attacking prowess: Burgess Hill scored in 72% of their last 29 outings.
Defensive concern: Cray Wanderers conceded in 79% of 28 recent games.
Scoring Trends
Recent Form & Match History
Burgess Hill
(Home)Cray Wanderers
(Away)League Standings
| Pos | Team | P | W | D | L | GD | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Folkestone | 42 | 29 | 9 | 4 | 102:40 | 96 |
| 2 | Aveley | 42 | 24 | 12 | 6 | 90:51 | 84 |
| 3 | Billericay | 42 | 24 | 10 | 8 | 81:48 | 82 |
| 4 | Chatham | 42 | 24 | 7 | 11 | 83:35 | 79 |
| 5 | Brentwood | 42 | 24 | 6 | 12 | 84:66 | 78 |
| 6 | Dartford | 42 | 20 | 12 | 10 | 81:55 | 72 |
| 7 | Cray Wanderers | 42 | 17 | 16 | 9 | 79:71 | 67 |
| 8 | Burgess Hill | 42 | 20 | 7 | 15 | 76:81 | 67 |
| 9 | Dulwich Hamlet | 42 | 17 | 11 | 14 | 61:53 | 62 |
| 10 | Ramsgate | 42 | 15 | 12 | 15 | 73:68 | 57 |
| 11 | St. Albans | 42 | 16 | 8 | 18 | 71:59 | 56 |
| 12 | Chichester City | 42 | 14 | 13 | 15 | 57:63 | 55 |
| 13 | Cheshunt | 42 | 12 | 14 | 16 | 65:70 | 50 |
| 14 | Whitehawk | 42 | 12 | 13 | 17 | 58:72 | 49 |
| 15 | Welling | 42 | 15 | 3 | 24 | 54:75 | 48 |
| 16 | Wingate & Finchley | 42 | 12 | 10 | 20 | 55:67 | 46 |
| 17 | Lewes | 42 | 13 | 7 | 22 | 47:83 | 46 |
| 18 | Carshalton | 42 | 10 | 14 | 18 | 61:73 | 44 |
| 19 | Cray Valley | 42 | 11 | 9 | 22 | 54:80 | 42 |
| 20 | Hashtag | 42 | 11 | 9 | 22 | 60:87 | 42 |
| 21 | Potters | 42 | 9 | 3 | 30 | 46:94 | 30 |
| 22 | Canvey Island | 42 | 6 | 9 | 27 | 40:87 | 27 |